Incorporating primary eye care into primary health care: Piloting a perceived visual disability questionnaire based model in rural southern India – An observational study

Purpose: Over 20% of the world's visually impaired and blind populations live in India. Integration of primary eye care (PEC) into existing primary health care by trained personnel could address access-related barriers. We piloted an unreported, modified WHO disability questionnaire-based model for community health workers (CHWs) to screen and refer persons with perceived visual impairment instead of the traditional visual acuity model. The objective of the study was (1) to determine the prevalence of perceived visual impairment, rate of follow-up postreferral, distribution of ocular morbidity, visual impairment, and proportion of appropriate referrals and (2) to compare results of this intervention with those of existing services. Methods: CHWs were trained in administering a questionnaire for identification and referral of persons with perceived visual impairment in 7 rural villages and 22 tribal hamlets from the institutional database. In this cross-sectional study, patients screened and referred to PEC services from September 2014 to March 2015 underwent comprehensive ocular examination by an optometrist and ophthalmologist. Data collected from their records were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Of 18,534 individuals screened, 3082 (16.64%, 95% confidence interval: 16.06–17.14) complained of perceived visual impairment and were referred; 463 (15%) of these followed up for examination. Correct referrals were noted in 452 (97.6%) cases. Cataract (52.3%) and refractive error (15.8%) were the most common morbidities. There was a 39.6% increase in uptake of eye care services from baseline. Conclusion: The questionnaire-based screening tool administered by CHWs can lead to appropriate identification and referral of persons with ocular morbidity impacting uptake of eye care services

Sexual dysfunction among men in secondary care in southern India: Nature, prevalence, clinical features and explanatory models.

Background. Sexual dysfunction, common in general medical practice, is under-recognized and inadequately managed resulting in significant morbidity and reduction in quality of life. We examined the nature, prevalence, clinical features and explanatory models of illness among men with sexual dysfunction in a general healthcare setting. Methods. We recruited 270 consecutive men attending a general health clinic. Participants were evaluated using a structured interview. The International Index of Erectile Function-5, the Chinese Index of Premature Ejaculation-5, Short Explanatory Model Interview and the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule were used to assess sexual dysfunction, explanatory models and psychiatric morbidity. Results. Premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction were reported by 43.0% and 47.8% of men, respectively. The most common perceived causes were loss of semen due to masturbation and nocturnal emission. Popular treatments were herbal remedies and resources used were traditional healers. The factors associated with erectile dysfunction were diabetes mellitus, financial stress, past history of psychiatric treatment and common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety; those associated with premature ejaculation were common mental disorders, older age and financial debt. Sexual dysfunctions and concerns were under-diagnosed by physicians when compared to the research interview. Conclusion. There is a need to recognize sexual problems and effectively manage them in general medical settings. The need for sex education in schools and through the mass media, to remove sexual misconceptions, cannot be under-emphasized.

A tale behind the rectum.

Tailgut cysts, also called benign retrorectal hamartomas, are uncommon developmental cysts found behind the rectum. Here, we present a rare case of a tailgut cyst associated with uterine anomaly, sacral and vertebral anomalies and vascular duplication, in a young lady who presented with constipation and infertility.

Explanatory models and common mental disorders among patients with unexplained somatic symptoms attending a primary care facility in Tamil Nadu.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unexplained somatic symptoms are commonly seen in primary care. We assessed the explanatory models and common mental disorders in patients with unexplained somatic symptoms attending a primary care facility in a rural area of south India. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients diagnosed to have unexplained somatic symptoms attending a primary care facility were examined. The Tamil version of the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule was used to assess common mental disorders and the Tamil version of the Short Explanatory Model Interview was used to assess their explanatory models. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients thought that their problem was serious. Sixty-nine, 41 and 40 claimed that it affected their work, family and social lives, respectively. Forty-two of the patients believed in black magic. Forty-four patients satisfied the ICD-10 PC criteria for common mental disorders. Depression was the commonest diagnosis (63.6%). Patients with psychiatric diagnoses admitted to emotional problems (chi2 = 46.9; p < 0.001), and felt that their problems affected their family (chi2 = 38.5; p < 0.001), social life (chi2 = 28.6; p < 0.001) and work (chi2 = 34.4; p < 0.001). More patients who satisfied criteria for psychiatric diagnosis felt that their problems were moderate or very serious (chi2 = 21.5; p < 0.001) and they feared they might become disabled or die (chi2 = 12.2; p < 0.001). Psychiatric syndromes were significantly associated with belief in black magic (chi2 = 7.01; p < 0.01). These associations remained statstically significant after adjusting for age, gender, literacy and socioeconomic indices using logistic regression. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients held strong beliefs regarding the physical nature of their complaints, believed In the serious nature of the problem and feared disability or death. There is a need to elicit specific explanatory models regarding the nature of illness in patients who present with somatic symptoms without organic causes. Understanding the patient's perspectives is a prerequisite for providing the necessary treatment and to dispel fears.